Back to Resources

Guide

On-Premise Video Analytics Buying Guide

Author
DHI Safety OperationsEdge AI ArchitectureReviewed by DHI Engineering
Published
2026-07-02
Read time
9 min read
Updated
2026-07-02

Who this is for

For IT, security, legal, and operations teams deciding whether camera analytics should run on site or in the cloud.

The buyer question

What should a buyer verify before choosing on-premise video analytics?

Map video movement first

The first architecture question is where raw video travels. If raw streams leave the site, the legal, privacy, network, and labor review changes. If inference runs locally, the review can focus on event metadata and approved clip export.

Check local operating requirements

Local analytics still need stream access, edge compute, power, network placement, VMS routing, and support ownership. A strong buying process confirms these requirements before asking for model claims.

Use one site as the proof point

Pick one building, dock, platform, ward, or corridor and prove the whole path end to end: stream access, local inference, event routing, and the privacy review sign-off. A single proven site gives procurement and legal a real reference instead of a vendor's architecture diagram.

How to use this with DHI

Use this page as a pre-pilot checklist. Pick one zone, one event type, one alert owner, and one review cadence. If the current cameras cannot support the workflow, fix the camera plan before expanding the deployment.

Validate "on-premise video analytics buying guide" on your live feeds.

Coordinate a 30-day architecture review and live camera validation based on the protocol described in "on-premise video analytics buying guide" for your facility.

Best follow-up: bring the current workflow that "On-Premise Video Analytics Buying Guide" is supposed to improve.